Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Banned Books Week Contest

  • Oct. 3rd, 2007 at 3:52 PM
Prom Dates from Hell
The American Library Association is celebrating Banned Books Week.

Post in the comments and tell me your favorite book from the 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990-2000 OR the Most Challenged Books of the 21st Century according to the American Library Association and you could win a copy of one of the books on the 2006 list.

Post until midnight Sunday (12:01 AM on 7 October), then I'll randomly draw a winner.

If you are under 18, you can post, but if you win, you must have a parent type person's permission for me to send you anything in the mail, even a book. :-)

Comments

[info]christinenorris wrote:
Oct. 3rd, 2007 10:39 pm (UTC)
Harry Potter series, hands down.
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2007 11:21 pm (UTC)
Yes, I was completely unsurprised to know that JKR was the most challenged writer of the 21st century. Those scandalous wizards, you know.

Thanks for commenting!
[info]alanajoli wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2007 01:05 am (UTC)
What? A Wrinkle in Time is even on this list? (Not only that, but it's in the top twenty-five!) Huhzawha?

A Wrinkle in Time is one of those books that literally changed my life. I read it the summer between third and fourth grade, and it opened my imagination to the idea of the tesseract--getting from here to there by the shortest route possible. I started college believing that I wanted to go into nuclear physics in order to actually work on that project--making a tesseract possible through science. After calculus, I thought back on it and suspected that I might, just possibly, be more interested in the science fiction aspect than the science itself. And from that realization on, brought about by A Wrinkle in Time, I became a creative writing major, got internships in editorial, and eventually published a couple of novels.

I owe Madeline L'Engle a whole lot.
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 01:10 am (UTC)
I feel much the same way. A Wrinkle in Time would be my favorite book on the list, too. I wrote about it inthis post when L'Engle died a few weeks ago.
[info]xanath wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2007 04:04 am (UTC)
My favorite book would be The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier, but there were several on the 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books that I read as a kid and loved. I'm aghast. What are people thinking? What harm can reading The Pigman or Bridge to Terabithia do? And My Brother Sam is Dead gave me a completely different view of the Revolutionary War than the one I was currently being taught in school--maybe that's why it's challenged.

I'm really upset over Flowers for Algernon and The Great Gilly Hopkins being on that list. Now I want to go beat my head against the wall and cry, after I put those books on my Amazon wishlist.

--Kris
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 01:14 am (UTC)
A lot of them get challenged for the somewhat ambiguous reason of "age inappropriate." What does that mean? Some parent doesn't think there should be a book about death and dying in the elementary school library or curriculum.

I think it's a badge of honor. You've written something that makes people think, and that makes people afraid. (Well, some are just sensationalistic (*ahem* Gossip Girls) without having any deeper meaning, but that doesnt' make them dangerous.
[info]ewokallie wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2007 04:41 am (UTC)
Banned Books
Some of the reasons on these books are crazy! My favorite would be the #1 of 2000 Scary Stories (Series) by Alvin Schwartz. Read those when I was a wee one. When I read them now it still kinda scares the pee pee out of me. Followed by Stephen King's Carrie. Gonna have to say a little bit of me wanted to be her, except for her crazy psycho mom.
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 01:16 am (UTC)
Re: Banned Books
The interesting thing about Carrie is that the scariest thing in there wasn't the girl with the superpowers. It was everyone else.
[info]ewokallie wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 03:06 am (UTC)
Re: Banned Books
Ooooo...that's deep. Sad thing is that book was written in the 70's, I think, and some of those type of people haven't changed.
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 03:21 am (UTC)
Re: Banned Books
Yes, I'm very deep. Or it gets deep when I start philosophizing. Depends on your point of view, I guess.

But I agree--there is a certain type of person who will always exist. I was listening to a friend the other day telling me about how some girls from her daughter's school were posting catty comments about her on MySpace or facebook or one of those places. Only the medium has changed.
[info]librainiac wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2007 01:15 pm (UTC)
Definitely A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L'Engle.
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 01:18 am (UTC)
That's my first pick, too. :-)
[info]daily_rant wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2007 02:23 pm (UTC)
I remember the parent that tried to get the Goosebumps series banned from our book fair. That was our biggest money maker! No way! Of course this is coming from a Stephen King-aholic family. :p

The best way to make a book a best seller it so challenge it. Always Running became a best seller in Rockford after the school board almost voted to ban it from the curriculum.
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 01:19 am (UTC)
Yeah, some friends of mine were joking about what banning does for your sales. There must be something really racy in there if you're not supposed to read it, right?

[info]daily_rant wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 01:28 am (UTC)
People seem to be fond of quoting little titillating bits out of context to fan the flames, too.

I bet they are disappointed when that is all. *snort*

Non sequiter: Remember the Delgado kids? Jeremy just got a 12K theatre scholarship and 3K voice scholarship at Southwestern (where John Wolbers and Lesly Sheblak ended up) I think he swims for them, too. And Elizabeth graduated a year early and just got a 30K academic over four year scholarship to Southwestern.
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 03:24 am (UTC)
I do remember them! How awesome is that.

Which goes to show how spoiled I was as a teacher. I really had many more awesome, smart, talented kids than not. Talented in all areas, not just theatre.
[info]cosimod wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2007 08:39 pm (UTC)
Banned Books
First, I think I should say "hello," since I've never commented on your journal before. Hello!

I was surprised to see the Scary Story books on both lists. I was just reading those again, and loved them when I was younger. That was the most shocking. I like so many of the books on the lists, I now know where to look when I need a new book to read. Carrie, Harry Potter... Where's Waldo? (I'm still trying to understand that one; maybe the fact that he's lost scares small children!)
Well, I think my favorite is "The Catcher in the Rye," though.
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 01:20 am (UTC)
Re: Banned Books
Yeah, some of those baffle me, too. People get their knickers in a knot over the weirdest things!

Hi back attcha. I'm so glad you commented!
[info]ewokallie wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 03:03 am (UTC)
Re: Banned Books
The reason Where's Waldo is getting banned is due to the fact that the artist some how drew a topless woman sun bathing on a beach. You've got to be looking to find it. Kinda like the naughty parts in Disney, which is very questionable.
[info]cosimod wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 03:50 am (UTC)
Re: Banned Books
That's ridiculous. It was hard enough finding Waldo, and he was dressed pretty flamboyantly. Thank you for clarifying this craziness.
[info]pgl_zebtar wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2007 11:44 pm (UTC)
Banned books
I can't believe the adventures of huck fin is on the list??? That's one of my favorite stories of all time.

weird,

Paul(Red-shirt)
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2007 12:35 am (UTC)
Re: Banned books
Ha! Icon love!
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2007 04:27 am (UTC)
Re: Banned books
I thought it was racial, and i was right. From www.deletecensorship.org:

It was removed from Waukegan, Illinois high school reading list (1984) because of “racially offensive language and tone.” Removed from classrooms in the Cherry Hill, New Jersey schools (1997) after concerns were raised about its “racial epithets” and “depiction of its African-American characters.” Huck Finn was alos pulled from reading lists at three Renton, Washington high schools (2004) after an African-American student said the book degraded her and her culture. Ironically, this book which was attacked after its first publication for being “too racially tolerant” is now being attacked for being “too racist.” Twain’s classic was deemed upon publication as “rough, coarse and inelegant,” and not suited for “intelligent, respectable people.”
[info]rclementmoore wrote:
Oct. 8th, 2007 03:48 am (UTC)
Re: Banned books
Oops. Clarification> *I* didn't think the book was racial, except in the sense that it dealt with racial themes that were pertinent at the time it was written. In fact, at the time it was written, it was considered racially liberal, that Huck and Jim were friends and Huck was helping Jim escape. Hucks feelings on slavery are appropriate for the time, and part of the character.

What I meant to say was, I had thought the reasons for objections were based on the depiction of racial issues in the book, and I was right about that being the reason.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow